by Lind » Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:48 am
Hi Willie, welcome to the board.
I guess it's time I weighed in on this question. As BobNumbers points out, I wrote about it on the earlier message board. This is the gist of what I said:
Long before my fame carried me to England, back when I was a 19-year-old would-be singer/writer in Denver, I learned a song called "Nellie Nellie" from an album by a charismatic local folk singer named Walt Conley. For most of us in Denver, Walt's was the definitive version of the song (though it was written by Shel Silverstein). One night I played the song onstage and when I came off I saw that Walt was in the audience. I'd have never sung it had I known he was there.
I told him I was embarrassed because I felt my version was so inferior to his. He surprised me by saying, "I like the way you do it."
I said, "But yours was first, and it's better."
And he told me something I'll never forget and something that applies to this whole Val Doonican thing. He said: "The songs are for everyone. Once they get written they can and will go wherever they want to. No better or worse about it."
All this by way of saying, that as a songwriter, this is a philosophy I still hold to today.
When I got to England in late '66, Val Doonican had already released his cut of "Butterfly." The British press tried to stir up controversy and rivalry between him and me. A group of prestigious pop icons like The Yardbirds, Eric Burden and Dusty Springfield took out a full-page ad in one of the trades saying "Bob Lind's is the original and BEST version of "Elusive Butterly."
Much as I admired these artists, and as much as I appreciated their sentiments, I couldn't sign on for all that better-worse stuff. I still welcome covers of my songs. Whose is best is a totally subjective call.
I know lots of songwriters consider their way of doing their songs is the best and only way and don't like to hear their songs approached in a different style. That's not the way I look at it.
Nothing makes me happier than to hear an artist completely surprise me by, in effect, showing me something about the song I never knew was there.
The other day, my manager and I were listening to Richie Havens' version of "How the Nights Can Fly" on his CUTS TO THE CHASE CD.
She said, "I like it. But it's a different song the way he does it."
I agree. I use this example because it's probably my favorite Lind cover.
Richie alters the lyric. I my opinion he "misses" an important aspect of the song (the aspect I place first in my version): tension. To me, the whole song is about the tension in our lives -- being moved forward by time while our hearts try vainly to hold us in place; being rushed into the future by time while wanting to hold onto some beautiful moment in the past.
Richie either misses or disregards that in his lyric choices.
BUT -- and HERE'S THE "BUT" -- he sings it with such tenderness, such feeling, such warmth that it emerges as a whole new piece.
Do I like artists changing my lyrics? No. I don't.
Is it cool in Richie's case? Yes. Because he's such a commanding artist. His choices have validity because it's he who is making them.
All this by way of saying I love all 200-plus cuts of my songs and the ones I love most are the ones that teach me that my songs are deeper and more varied than I knew when I first wrote them.
BTW a recent example of covers that work that way is Jamie Hoover's EP CD "Lind Me 4" in which Jamie (the Spongetones' singer/guitarist) recuts four of my early songs. He keeps the spirit of the tunes but gives them something all his own.
I write about this elsewhere, but let me say again, any Lind fan should definitely hear what Jamie does with these songs.
Hi Willie, welcome to the board.
I guess it's time I weighed in on this question. As BobNumbers points out, I wrote about it on the earlier message board. This is the gist of what I said:
Long before my fame carried me to England, back when I was a 19-year-old would-be singer/writer in Denver, I learned a song called "Nellie Nellie" from an album by a charismatic local folk singer named Walt Conley. For most of us in Denver, Walt's was the definitive version of the song (though it was written by Shel Silverstein). One night I played the song onstage and when I came off I saw that Walt was in the audience. I'd have never sung it had I known he was there.
I told him I was embarrassed because I felt my version was so inferior to his. He surprised me by saying, "I like the way you do it."
I said, "But yours was first, and it's better."
And he told me something I'll never forget and something that applies to this whole Val Doonican thing. He said: "The songs are for everyone. Once they get written they can and will go wherever they want to. No better or worse about it."
All this by way of saying, that as a songwriter, this is a philosophy I still hold to today.
When I got to England in late '66, Val Doonican had already released his cut of "Butterfly." The British press tried to stir up controversy and rivalry between him and me. A group of prestigious pop icons like The Yardbirds, Eric Burden and Dusty Springfield took out a full-page ad in one of the trades saying "Bob Lind's is the original and BEST version of "Elusive Butterly."
Much as I admired these artists, and as much as I appreciated their sentiments, I couldn't sign on for all that better-worse stuff. I still welcome covers of my songs. Whose is best is a totally subjective call.
I know lots of songwriters consider their way of doing their songs is the best and only way and don't like to hear their songs approached in a different style. That's not the way I look at it.
Nothing makes me happier than to hear an artist completely surprise me by, in effect, showing me something about the song I never knew was there.
The other day, my manager and I were listening to Richie Havens' version of "How the Nights Can Fly" on his CUTS TO THE CHASE CD.
She said, "I like it. But it's a different song the way he does it."
I agree. I use this example because it's probably my favorite Lind cover.
Richie alters the lyric. I my opinion he "misses" an important aspect of the song (the aspect I place first in my version): tension. To me, the whole song is about the tension in our lives -- being moved forward by time while our hearts try vainly to hold us in place; being rushed into the future by time while wanting to hold onto some beautiful moment in the past.
Richie either misses or disregards that in his lyric choices.
BUT -- and HERE'S THE "BUT" -- he sings it with such tenderness, such feeling, such warmth that it emerges as a whole new piece.
Do I like artists changing my lyrics? No. I don't.
Is it cool in Richie's case? Yes. Because he's such a commanding artist. His choices have validity because it's he who is making them.
All this by way of saying I love all 200-plus cuts of my songs and the ones I love most are the ones that teach me that my songs are deeper and more varied than I knew when I first wrote them.
BTW a recent example of covers that work that way is Jamie Hoover's EP CD "Lind Me 4" in which Jamie (the Spongetones' singer/guitarist) recuts four of my early songs. He keeps the spirit of the tunes but gives them something all his own.
I write about this elsewhere, but let me say again, any Lind fan should definitely hear what Jamie does with these songs.